The Fischer vs. Traditional Iontophoresis

iontophoresis-machine-fischer-hyperhidrosis-hotspot

The Fischer vs. Traditional Iontophoresis

RA Fischer Co. has been the #1 doctor recommended brand since the company’s inception back in 1948. This comparison breaks down the differences between the new metal-free Fischer iontophoresis device and traditional metal-based devices in the following categories: safety, ease-of-use, and effectiveness.

The SAFEST Iontophoresis Device

Safety features

Silicone-graphite electrodes
No open metal contacts
Flexible underarm attachments
Anti-shock guard
Automatic polarity switch
Precise current control
Pulsed current option

7/7winner

2/7below average

3/7average

2/7below average

The EASIEST Iontophoresis Device

Ease-of-use features

One-touch start
Three-button interface
Active Treatment Display
Session memory
Non-corroding electrodes
Power plug, no batteries
Direct & Pulsed current in one
Treats hands & feet at the same time

8/8winner

4/8average

3/8below average

0/8poor

The MOST EFFECTIVE Iontophoresis Device

Efficiency features

Max current output
Direct Current (DC)
Max voltage output
Constant polarity
Treats hands & feet at the same time
Power plug, no batteries
Non-corroding electrodes
Warranty

7/8winner

30 mA (milliamperes)
58 volts
4-years

4/8average

35/20 mA
60/40 volts
5-years (control unit only)

2/8below average

25/15/8 mA
55/48/30 volts
5-years

1/8poor

14 mA
9 volts
6-months

The Fischer vs. Hidrex

Things To Know

DP450 Model: max 40 V, means max 20 mA at 2 kOhm
DVP1000 Model: max 60 V, means max 30 mA at 2 kOhm (up to 35 mA at lower body resistances)
No automatic polarity change
No combined hand/feet treatment offered
5-year warranty only covers main control unit

According To Hidrex’s Manual

“One or both of the aluminum electrodes may discolor after several treatments. … Calcifications on the electrodes can hinder the treatment current.”

The Fischer vs. Dermadry

Things To Know

Predefined treatment times: 20 min for feet/hands
and 15 min for underarms
Max. current: 25, 15 and 8 mA (Feet, Hands, Underarms)
Only Pulsed Current (less efficient of the treatment options)
Predefined polarity change (every 5 min, which is less effective)
Up to 6 weeks (with 3 to 5 sessions per week) before seeing (first) results …

According To Dermadry’s Manual

“Completely corroded electrodes can prevent the device from delivering current. They are consumables and should be replaced when necessary.”
$189 in replacement costs over first 5-years
- “Every 1-2 years towels, underarm electrodes and tray electrodes shall be replaced.”
  - 2 (replacements) x ($ 9 + $ 27 + $ 36) = $ 144
- “Every years underarm pockets shall be replaced.”
  - 5 (replacements) x $ 9 = $ 45

The Fischer vs. Drionic

Things To Know

Aluminum electrodes corrode and need to be replaced
These electrodes can release aluminum ions into the water
Fingernails are submerged during treatment even though they’re very sensitive and don’t sweat
Electrodes need to be unscrewed to be removed
Only a 6-month warranty
Just a thumbwheel for adjusting the current

According To Drionic’s Manual

“Treatment duration up to 60 min per day …”
“Treatment will includes all areas submerges beneath the water level …” (which doesn’t completely cover the palms of your hands or the soles of your feet)
$100 in replacement costs per year per area being treated
- “Battery life may vary between 10 and 12 half-hour treatments”
  - Daily use for the first 6 weeks: 6 x 7 days = 56 half-hour treatments
  - Weekly use for the rest of the year: 45 weeks, 45 half-hour treatments
  - About 100 half-hour treatments per year, means battery consumption of 10 batteries per year per single limb
  - Battery costs per year per extremity = 10 x $ 8 = $ 80